Parker v. Horton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Parker v. Horton

103 S.E. 546, 114 S.C. 313, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 130

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 28, 1920

Docket10422

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 546 (Parker v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Horton, 103 S.E. 546, 114 S.C. 313, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 130 (S.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court, was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Gary.

The facts are stated in the decree of his Honor, which, ■together with the exceptions, will be reported.

The respondent’s attorneys in their written argument concede that there is but one issue in the case, and that is whether the fact that the lands were returned as the prop *319 erty of Nancy Hough’s estate, and not as the estate of Isaac Hough rendered the title of the purchaser void.

The case of Taylor v. Strauss, 95 S. C. 295, 78 S. E. 883, is conclusive of this question, and shows that his Honor, the Circuit Judge, was in error.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI