Parker v. Horton

103 S.E. 546, 114 S.C. 313, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 130
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 28, 1920·No. 10422·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court, was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Gary.

The facts are stated in the decree of his Honor, which, ■together with the exceptions, will be reported.

The respondent’s attorneys in their written argument concede that there is but one issue in the case, and that is whether the fact that the lands were returned as the prop *319 erty of Nancy Hough’s estate, and not as the estate of Isaac Hough rendered the title of the purchaser void.

The case of Taylor v. Strauss, 95 S. C. 295, 78 S. E. 883, is conclusive of this question, and shows that his Honor, the Circuit Judge, was in error.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Horton, 103 S.E. 546, 114 S.C. 313, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 130 (S.C. 1920).

103 S.E. 546 (Parker v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Jennings
106 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Vallentine v. Robinson
198 S.E. 197 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
Carter v. Wroten
198 S.E. 13 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
Cook v. Knight
175 S.E. 506 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Hines v. Gravins
112 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1922)