Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel

Fourth Circuit

Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel

141 F. App'x 196

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1628

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 F. App'x 196 (Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, 141 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sara E. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her housing discrimination action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, No. CA-05-69-5 (E.D.N.C. May 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sara E. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her housing discrimination action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, No. CA-05-69-5 (E.D.N.C. May 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 F. App'x 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-homestead-studio-suites-hotel-ca4-2005.