Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel

Fourth Circuit

Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel

141 F. App'x 196

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2005·No. No. 05-1628·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sara E. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her housing discrimination action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, No. CA-05-69-5 (E.D.N.C. May 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sara E. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her housing discrimination action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, No. CA-05-69-5 (E.D.N.C. May 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel, 141 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

141 F. App'x 196 (Parker v. Homestead Studio Suites Hotel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.