Parker v. Harrison
This text of 63 Miss. 225 (Parker v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court/
The demurrer was rightly overruled. The complainant was a co-tenant of all of the lands sought to be partitioned, and brought before the court the alienees of her former co-tenants, so that their interests would be protected. Surely, they cannot successfully complain of this. It is the right of one of several co-tenants to convey his interest in the whole or a part of the joint estate, but this-[228]*228shall not prejudice the rights of a co-tenant who has not aliened and desires to obtain partition.
It is not allowable for a co-tenant to split the joint estate into fragments, and necessitate as many separate suits for partition as there may be conveyances. He who has a joint interest in the several parcels may proceed as if no conveyance had been made by any of his co-tenants, and bring all parties in interest before the court, which will do justice between the parties according to their several rights. 1 Story’s Eq. Jur., § 656c, 657.
We agree with the Chancellor in his conclusion upon the facts.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Miss. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-harrison-miss-1885.