Parker v. Hallock
This text of 18 F. Cas. 1127 (Parker v. Hallock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action [by Zebulon Parker against S. B. Hal-lock] for infringement of a patent right. In this case the defendant’s counsel insisted that the plaintiff was barred by the statute of limitations: Belt, that, as no act of congress had been passed to meet the case, and the law of Pennsylvania did not apply to it, there was no statute limiting the time in which a suit might be brought for an infringement of a- patent right. The jury found for the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $68.
[Before GRIER, Circuit Justice. Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible. Originally published in 2 Fish. Pat. Cas. 543, as a note to Collins v. Peebles, Case No. 3,-017.]
[Reported by Samuel S. Fisher, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. Cas. 1127, 2 Fish. Pat. Cas. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-hallock-circtdpa-1857.