Parker v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Parker v. Gilbert

106 So. 41, 213 Ala. 699, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 464

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 22, 1925·No. 6 Div. 352.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The action is in detinue in Code form.

Under the undisputed evidence, plaintiff was entitled to recover the property sued for, or its alternate value, and also the several other items found. Accordingly, if there was technical error in any of the adverse rulings complained of, whether in receiving or rejecting evidence or in giving or refusing charges, it is wholly without influence upon the result, and without prejudice to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SOMERVILLE, J.

The action is in detinue in Code form.

Under the undisputed evidence, plaintiff was entitled to recover the property sued for, or its alternate value, and also the several other items found. Accordingly, if there was technical error in any of the adverse rulings complained of, whether in receiving or rejecting evidence or in giving or refusing charges, it is wholly without influence upon the result, and without prejudice to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Parker v. Gilbert, 106 So. 41, 213 Ala. 699, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 464 (Ala. 1925).

Pincite

106 So. 41 (Parker v. Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related