Parker v. Dunn

135 So. 158, 101 Fla. 763, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1835
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 158 (Parker v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Dunn, 135 So. 158, 101 Fla. 763, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1835 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree except the allowance of attorney’s fees. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court of Washington County be, and the same is hereby affirmed in all respects except as to the allowance of attorney’s fees, which should be eliminated therefrom upon the authority of Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. Eilenberger, 98 Fla. 775, 124 So. 41.

Decree modified and affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J. J., concur. Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. Eilenberger
124 So. 41 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 158, 101 Fla. 763, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-dunn-fla-1931.