Parker v. Director of Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Parker v. Director of Department of Corrections

396 F. App'x 967

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. No. 10-6349·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samson M. Parker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for copies at the government’s expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Dir. of Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:08-cv-00780-LOT-CB (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 16, 2010 & entered Feb. 18, 2010). We deny Parker’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [968]*968and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samson M. Parker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for copies at the government’s expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Dir. of Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:08-cv-00780-LOT-CB (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 16, 2010 & entered Feb. 18, 2010). We deny Parker’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [968]*968and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Parker v. Director of Department of Corrections, 396 F. App'x 967 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

396 F. App'x 967 (Parker v. Director of Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.