Parker v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Parker v. Daniel

84 S.E. 483, 16 Ga. App. 23, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 487

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 18, 1915

Docket5478

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 483 (Parker v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Daniel, 84 S.E. 483, 16 Ga. App. 23, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 487 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

There was circumstantial evidence which authorized the inference that the plaintiff acquired title to the note subsequently to its maturity, and that for that reason he was not a bona fide purchaser. The charge of the court was a full, fair and able presentation of the law applicable to the case, and, when considered as a whole, was not subject to any of the exceptions presented in the motion for a new trial. For that reason the verdict approved by the trial judge will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.

Complaint; from city court of Jefferson — Judge Johns. December 16, 1913.

A. 0. Brown, John J. & Boy M. Strickland, for plaintiff. G. C. Thomas, T. J. Shackelford, W. M. Smith, P. Cooley, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

There was circumstantial evidence which authorized the inference that the plaintiff acquired title to the note subsequently to its maturity, and that for that reason he was not a bona fide purchaser. The charge of the court was a full, fair and able presentation of the law applicable to the case, and, when considered as a whole, was not subject to any of the exceptions presented in the motion for a new trial. For that reason the verdict approved by the trial judge will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.

Complaint; from city court of Jefferson — Judge Johns. December 16, 1913.

A. 0. Brown, John J. & Boy M. Strickland, for plaintiff. G. C. Thomas, T. J. Shackelford, W. M. Smith, P. Cooley, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 S.E. 483, 16 Ga. App. 23, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-daniel-gactapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack