Parker v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parker v. Coughlin

176 A.D.2d 1231, 578 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13937

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1991·Published

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We find that the written misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer positively identifying petitioner constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of miscon[1232] duct (see generally, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). Petitioner failed to establish at the disciplinary hearing that he was prejudiced by an alleged inadequacy of employee assistance (see, Matter of Wright v Scully, 124 AD2d 805). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We find that the written misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer positively identifying petitioner constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of miscon[1232] duct (see generally, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). Petitioner failed to establish at the disciplinary hearing that he was prejudiced by an alleged inadequacy of employee assistance (see, Matter of Wright v Scully, 124 AD2d 805). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Parker v. Coughlin, 176 A.D.2d 1231, 578 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

176 A.D.2d 1231 (Parker v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related