Parker v. Copland

Michigan Supreme Court

Parker v. Copland

4 Mich. 528

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Court held,

Oreen, J.,

delivering the opinion orally, that error was the proper remedy. That, granting the proceedings in their inception were summary, yet, after ¡their [530]*530arrival in the Circuit, they were according to the course of the common law, and that, as certiorari only brings up the. question of jurisdiction, in the Court below, error is the only method of reviewing the charge of the Judge.

The motion was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court held,

Oreen, J.,

delivering the opinion orally, that error was the proper remedy. That, granting the proceedings in their inception were summary, yet, after ¡their [530]*530arrival in the Circuit, they were according to the course of the common law, and that, as certiorari only brings up the. question of jurisdiction, in the Court below, error is the only method of reviewing the charge of the Judge.

The motion was overruled.

Parker v. Copland, 4 Mich. 528 (Mich. 1857).

Pincite

4 Mich. 528 (Parker v. Copland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related