Parker v. Coopersurgical, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided July 15, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00494·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

BETH PARKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 20-494 JPG

COOPERSURGICAL, INC.,et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In light of Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals admonitions, see Foster v. Hill, 497 F.3d 695, 696-97 (7th Cir. 2007), the Court has undertaken a rigorous initial review of pleadings to ensure that jurisdiction has been properly pled. See Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 94 (2010) (noting courts’ “independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even when no party challenges it”). The Court has noted the following defects in the jurisdictional allegations of the Complaint (Doc. 1) filed by plaintiff: Failure to allege the citizenship of a corporation. A corporation is a citizen of both the state of its principal place of business and the state of its incorporation. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The relevant pleading must affirmatively allege the specific states of incorporation and principal place of business of a corporate party. Dismissal is appropriate if a plaintiff fails to make such allegations. Indiana Hi- Rail Corp. v. Decatur Junction Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 363, 366 n. 3 (7th Cir. 1994). Complaint alleges headquarters of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women’s Health, Inc., Cooper Companies, Inc. and Coopersurgical, Inc. but does not state the principal place of business or the state of incorporation.

The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff shall have up to and including July 29, 2020 to amend the faulty pleading to correct the jurisdictional defect. See 28 U.S.C. § 1653. Failure to amend the faulty pleading may result in dismissal of this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Amendment of the faulty pleading to reflect an adequate basis for subject matter jurisdiction will satisfy this order. Plaintiff is directed to consult Local Rule 15.1 regarding amended pleadings and need not seek leave of Court to file such amended

pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 15, 2020

s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Coopersurgical, Inc., (S.D. Ill. 2020).

Parker v. Coopersurgical, Inc. (Parker v. Coopersurgical, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hertz Corp. v. Friend
559 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Foster v. Hill
497 F.3d 695 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)