Parker v. Cooperman

995 A.2d 1182, 606 Pa. 194, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1255
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 10, 2010
Docket12 EM 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 995 A.2d 1182 (Parker v. Cooperman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Cooperman, 995 A.2d 1182, 606 Pa. 194, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1255 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of *195 Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filing to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
995 A.2d 1182, 606 Pa. 194, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-cooperman-pa-2010.