Parker v. City of Hampton

Fourth Circuit

Parker v. City of Hampton

57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755, 1995 WL 365001

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 19, 1995

Docket95-6344

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1067 (Parker v. City of Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. City of Hampton, 57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755, 1995 WL 365001 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Monroe Roosevelt PARKER, Jr., Bishop, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HAMPTON; Leslie P. Smith; B.J. Roberts; Nelson T.
Overton; Walter J. Ford; J.E. Adams; Lieutenant McCoy;
Christopher J. Hutton; James P. Bohnaker; Al Banwell;
R.C. Woodburn; Police Officer Boice; Police Officer
Garrett; Police Officer Eckert; Henrico County Jail; A.D.
Mathew, Sheriff; D.H. Dailey; R.C. Engels; Henrico County
Police Department; Henrico County Board of Supervisors;
Henrico County Jail Internal Affairs; E. Belvin, EMSA;
R.T. Baer; E.B. Hughston; Commonwealth of Virginia; R.
Sprouse, Deputy Sheriff; Ed Mullins, Internal Affairs
Officer; Burnett Miller, III, District Court Judge; James
E. Kulp, Circuit Court Judge; Toby Vick, Commonwealth
Attorney; Chris Collins; D.P. Smith; Timothy J. Sullivan;
Carol Disque; Frederick Reese; Joann Gilley; Jan
Barrymore; Linda Nicely; Mike Roberts; Pam Tansmore;
Hampton Police Department; Lisa Brauswyler; James Beehler,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6344.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: June 19, 1995.

Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaints as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. City of Hampton, No. CA-95-130-N (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Monroe Roosevelt PARKER, Jr., Bishop, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HAMPTON; Leslie P. Smith; B.J. Roberts; Nelson T.
Overton; Walter J. Ford; J.E. Adams; Lieutenant McCoy;
Christopher J. Hutton; James P. Bohnaker; Al Banwell;
R.C. Woodburn; Police Officer Boice; Police Officer
Garrett; Police Officer Eckert; Henrico County Jail; A.D.
Mathew, Sheriff; D.H. Dailey; R.C. Engels; Henrico County
Police Department; Henrico County Board of Supervisors;
Henrico County Jail Internal Affairs; E. Belvin, EMSA;
R.T. Baer; E.B. Hughston; Commonwealth of Virginia; R.
Sprouse, Deputy Sheriff; Ed Mullins, Internal Affairs
Officer; Burnett Miller, III, District Court Judge; James
E. Kulp, Circuit Court Judge; Toby Vick, Commonwealth
Attorney; Chris Collins; D.P. Smith; Timothy J. Sullivan;
Carol Disque; Frederick Reese; Joann Gilley; Jan
Barrymore; Linda Nicely; Mike Roberts; Pam Tansmore;
Hampton Police Department; Lisa Brauswyler; James Beehler,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6344.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: June 19, 1995.

Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaints as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. City of Hampton, No. CA-95-130-N (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755, 1995 WL 365001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-city-of-hampton-ca4-1995.