Parker v. Chinnery

Fourth Circuit

Parker v. Chinnery

146 F. App'x 683

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2005·No. No. 05-1755·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gearlean B. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because she failed to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and [684]*684find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Parker v. Chinnery, No. CA-05-3-4 (E.D. Va. June 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gearlean B. Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because she failed to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and [684]*684find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Parker v. Chinnery, No. CA-05-3-4 (E.D. Va. June 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Parker v. Chinnery, 146 F. App'x 683 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

146 F. App'x 683 (Parker v. Chinnery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.