Parker v. Cartzler

18 F. Cas. 1122, 5 McLean 4
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
DecidedOctober 15, 1849
StatusPublished

This text of 18 F. Cas. 1122 (Parker v. Cartzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Cartzler, 18 F. Cas. 1122, 5 McLean 4 (circtdoh 1849).

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The court have generally followed the practice of the state court, in allowing witness fees. In perhaps all the states in' this circuit, each witness is allowed to claim his per diem in all the cases in which he has been summoned. But this in some eases would give a witness in the circuit court of the United States from ten to twenty dollars each day. Such cases require the alteration of the rule, and we, therefore, adopt a rule, “that where a witness shall be summoned in several causes, he Shall be allowed a per diem and mileage only in one case; and such allowance shall be distributed and charged equally among the cases in which he shall be summoned.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 1122, 5 McLean 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-cartzler-circtdoh-1849.