Parker v. Bernal

4 P. 1090, 66 Cal. 113, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 704
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 1884
DocketNo. 8,444
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 P. 1090 (Parker v. Bernal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Bernal, 4 P. 1090, 66 Cal. 113, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 704 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

The Court.

— Street assessment suit. The action was brought against several persons, heirs of one Jose Jesus Bernal, deceased, and two persons, executrixes of the will of deceased. The executrixes alone answered. After trial, the court found that at the time of the assessment the said defendants were the owners of the premises on which the lien is claimed to exist. Some two years after, in rendering judgment, the action was dismissed as to all the defendants, except the executrixes, and thereupon judgment was rendered for plaintiff. We see no error in this, affecting any substantial right of the defendants. According to section 17 of the Act of April 1st, 1872 (Stat. 1871—2, p. 818), the person owning the fee, or in the possession of the premises, or exercising acts of ownership for himself, or as administrator or guardian, or the person in whom the legal title appears by recorded deeds to be, shall be deemed the owner, for the purposes of the act. It was, therefore, competent that the action should have been brought against the executrixes (equivalent for this purpose to administrator), even though the heirs of a deceased person be in fact the owners. That being the case, there was no error in dismissing as to the heirs, and rendering judgment as to the executrixes.

We cannot say that the description given does not give the boundaries of any land.

The other questions presented have been passed on by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
59 P. 764 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Phelan v. Dunne
13 P. 662 (California Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P. 1090, 66 Cal. 113, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-bernal-cal-1884.