Parker v. Baton Rouge Elec. & Machine Works

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Parker v. Baton Rouge Elec. & Machine Works

2 La. App. 128, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 376

DecidedApril 3, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 2 La. App. 128 (Parker v. Baton Rouge Elec. & Machine Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Baton Rouge Elec. & Machine Works, 2 La. App. 128, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 376 (La. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

LECHE, J.

Plaintiff’s suit is based upon a claim for one hundred and thirty-nine 42/100 dollars, representing a balance on the purchase price together with transportation charges, of an electric sign sold and delivered to defendant. The defense is that the sign was not made according to the specifications in the contract of sale. The district court rendered 'judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for and defendant has appealed.

The case is submitted to this court upon the record without brief or argument.

The evidenc in the record consists of the testimony of three witnesses who testified under commission, in behalf of plaintiff. That testimony seems to support the demand of plaintiff and finding no error in the judgment appealed from, we believe it should be affirmed and

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LECHE, J.

Plaintiff’s suit is based upon a claim for one hundred and thirty-nine 42/100 dollars, representing a balance on the purchase price together with transportation charges, of an electric sign sold and delivered to defendant. The defense is that the sign was not made according to the specifications in the contract of sale. The district court rendered 'judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for and defendant has appealed.

The case is submitted to this court upon the record without brief or argument.

The evidenc in the record consists of the testimony of three witnesses who testified under commission, in behalf of plaintiff. That testimony seems to support the demand of plaintiff and finding no error in the judgment appealed from, we believe it should be affirmed and

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 La. App. 128, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-baton-rouge-elec-machine-works-lactapp-1925.