Parker v. Bamker

18 F. Cas. 1114, 6 McLean 631
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
DecidedOctober 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 F. Cas. 1114 (Parker v. Bamker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Bamker, 18 F. Cas. 1114, 6 McLean 631 (circtsdoh 1855).

Opinion

This is an action for damages, by the plaintiff [Zebulon Parker, against Thomas Bamker], for the infringement of plaintiff’s patent, in using his percussion water wheel for mills, etc. No plea being filed, the charge in the declaration was admitted. A witness being sworn, proved the use of the wheel three months in the year; that 3,000 feet of plank would be sawed in a day, and he estimated one-fourth of the proceeds for the expense of the mill, one-fourth to keep the [1115]*1115mill in repair, one-fourth for the hire of a sawyer, and the other fourth for profit, which amounted, in five years, to the sum of $460, for which the jury found a verdict Judgment

[For other cases involving this patent see note to Parker v. Hatfield, Case No. 10,736.] Hr. Stanbery, for plaintiff.

Several other cases were decided on the same, principle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Southern Pac. Co.
172 F. 909 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 1114, 6 McLean 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-bamker-circtsdoh-1855.