Parker v. Bally's Corporation

Opinion

Sophia Parker, 2:24-cv-01880-CDS-MDC Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

Bally's Corporation, et al., Defendants. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 60) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a discovery plan and proposed scheduling within thirty (30) days of a decision denying in whole or in part defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. The Court notes that plaintiff seeks to proceed under a pseudonym and has failed to file a certificate of interested parties. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall show cause why she may prosecute this matter under a pseudonym AND be excused from the requirements of Local Rule 7.1-1. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (“the title of the complaint must name all the parties); see also Doe v. Kamehameha Sch., 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal citations omitted) (“The normal presumption in litigation is that parties must use their real names.”). Plaintiff shall file a response showing cause, if any, within thirty (30) days of a decision denying in whole or in part defendants’ Motions to Dismiss or granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.” DATED this 1* day of April 2025. 7 we IT IS SO ORDERED. phe ff fi Hog’Maximiliario D./Ceevillier III nited States Wlagistfate Judge