Parker v. Acme Fire Equipment Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parker v. Acme Fire Equipment Co.

490 So. 2d 248, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1456, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8614

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2449

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 490 So. 2d 248 (Parker v. Acme Fire Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker v. Acme Fire Equipment Co., 490 So. 2d 248, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1456, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a determination that Acme Fire Equipment Company, the defendant below, did not conclusively show, as it was required to do, that under Section 440.11(2), Florida Statutes (1979), it was a “safety consultant ... [which had assisted] ... the employer in carrying out the employer’s rights and responsibilities under [chapter 440] by furnishing any safety inspection, safety consultative service, or other safety service incidental to the workers’ compensation or employers’ liability servicing contract,” and thus entitled to the immunity there provided to such safety consultants, we reverse the summary judgment entered in Acme’s favor exclusively on this ground and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a determination that Acme Fire Equipment Company, the defendant below, did not conclusively show, as it was required to do, that under Section 440.11(2), Florida Statutes (1979), it was a “safety consultant ... [which had assisted] ... the employer in carrying out the employer’s rights and responsibilities under [chapter 440] by furnishing any safety inspection, safety consultative service, or other safety service incidental to the workers’ compensation or employers’ liability servicing contract,” and thus entitled to the immunity there provided to such safety consultants, we reverse the summary judgment entered in Acme’s favor exclusively on this ground and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 So. 2d 248, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1456, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-acme-fire-equipment-co-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack