Parker Peanut Co. v. M.H. Felder Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Parker Peanut Co. v. M.H. Felder Co.

13 S.E.2d 143, 196 S.C. 271, 1941 S.C. LEXIS 125

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 12, 1941

Docket15213

StatusPublished

This text of 13 S.E.2d 143 (Parker Peanut Co. v. M.H. Felder Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parker Peanut Co. v. M.H. Felder Co., 13 S.E.2d 143, 196 S.C. 271, 1941 S.C. LEXIS 125 (S.C. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

February 12, 1941. The opinion of the Court was delivered by After a painstaking examination and consideration of the lengthy record in this case, and the briefs of counsel, we are satisfied that all issues raised by the appeal were correctly decided by the Circuit Court in its comprehensive decree. In our view a prima facie showing was made which warranted the appointment of a Receiver, and this was all that the lower Court undertook to adjudge. A final determination of the issue on its merits was expressly reserved, with the right granted to all of the parties to introduce further testimony.

We adopt the decree as the judgment of this Court. Let it be reported.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MR. JUSTICE BAKER and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE L.D. LIDE concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

February 12, 1941. The opinion of the Court was delivered by After a painstaking examination and consideration of the lengthy record in this case, and the briefs of counsel, we are satisfied that all issues raised by the appeal were correctly decided by the Circuit Court in its comprehensive decree. In our view a prima facie showing was made which warranted the appointment of a Receiver, and this was all that the lower Court undertook to adjudge. A final determination of the issue on its merits was expressly reserved, with the right granted to all of the parties to introduce further testimony.

We adopt the decree as the judgment of this Court. Let it be reported.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MR. JUSTICE BAKER and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE L.D. LIDE concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.E.2d 143, 196 S.C. 271, 1941 S.C. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-peanut-co-v-mh-felder-co-sc-1941.