Parker-McCaskill Furniture Co. v. Saint Pasteur

113 S.E. 817, 29 Ga. App. 86, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 70
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 23, 1922·No. 13018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The defense of failure of consideration can not be set up against a bona fide purchaser of a negotiable instrument for value before maturity without notice of such defense.

2. One in possession of negotiable paper indorsed in blank by the payee thereof is prima facie the holder of the legal title thereto.

3. This being a suit by the transferee of certain negotiable instruments designated as trade acceptances, applying the above principles the court did not err in ruling upon objections to testimony, or, under the undisputed testimony, in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenlcms, P. J., and Bell, J., eonew.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker-McCaskill Furniture Co. v. Saint Pasteur, 113 S.E. 817, 29 Ga. App. 86, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 70 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 817 (Parker-McCaskill Furniture Co. v. Saint Pasteur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kreischer v. Bank of Louisville
124 S.E. 539 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)