Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.

135 A.3d 176, 635 Pa. 257, 2016 WL 1602638, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 843
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 20, 2016·No. 32 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty., 135 A.3d 176, 635 Pa. 257, 2016 WL 1602638, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 843 (Pa. 2016).

135 A.3d 176 (Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)