Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.

Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.

135 A.3d 176, 635 Pa. 257, 2016 WL 1602638, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 843
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 20, 2016
Docket32 EM 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.3d 176 (Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker, J. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty., 135 A.3d 176, 635 Pa. 257, 2016 WL 1602638, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 843 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.3d 176, 635 Pa. 257, 2016 WL 1602638, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-j-v-ct-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2016.