Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Parker Duryee Rosoff & Haft v. Ehrlich

Parker Duryee Rosoff & Haft v. Ehrlich

208 A.D.2d 411, 618 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9643
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 411 (Parker Duryee Rosoff & Haft v. Ehrlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker Duryee Rosoff & Haft v. Ehrlich, 208 A.D.2d 411, 618 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered on or about June 30, 1993, which, inter alia, awarded petitioner $150,000 in additional legal fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly rejected in part the findings of the Special Referee. The additional attorneys’ fees awarded to petitioner were warranted in light of the considerable work performed by petitioner for the benefit of respondent, who ultimately was awarded an equitable distribution of approximately $2 million (Haskin v Mendler, 184 AD2d 372, 373). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haskin v. Mendler
184 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.2d 411, 618 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-duryee-rosoff-haft-v-ehrlich-nyappdiv-1994.