Parker, C. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila Cty

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 19, 2015
Docket68 EM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of Parker, C. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila Cty (Parker, C. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila Cty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker, C. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila Cty, (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

CHARLES PARKER, : No. 68 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HON. JUDGE AMANDA COOPERMAN, : ET. AL., : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED, and the

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Parker, C. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila Cty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-c-v-ct-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2015.