Parker Brothers v. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc.
This text of 757 F.2d 254 (Parker Brothers v. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Parker Brothers appeals from denial by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) of its motion for summary judgment. *
As is its duty, the court raises sua sponte the question of its jurisdiction to *255 hear this appeal. Mansfield, C & L M.R.R. Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 382, 4 S.Ct. 510, 511, 28 L.Ed. 462 (1884); Wagner Shokai, Inc. v. Kabushiki Kaisha Wako, 699 F.2d 1390, 1391, 217 USPQ 98 (Fed.Cir.1983). See generally 5 WRIGHT & MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE §§ 1350, 1393.
An order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory, non-final, and non-appealable. 28 USC §§ 1291, 1292. That rule is applicable to orders entered by the Board. R.G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc., 609 F.2d 1002, 204 USPQ 195 (CCPA 1979); see also Wagner Shokai, 699 F.2d at 1391, 217 USPQ at 98. See generally 6 J. Moore & J. Wicker, MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE 1156.-21[2] (2d ed. 1982).
It is therefore ORDERED
1) that the appeal be dismissed.
Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. (TUXEDO) asks this court to reverse the Board's denial of its motion for summary judgment and to order cancellation of Parker’s registrations. Tuxedo filed no appeal, and its requests are therefore improper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
757 F.2d 254, 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 11, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-brothers-v-tuxedo-monopoly-inc-cafc-1985.