Parkening v. Arnold

148 F.2d 210, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3219
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 24, 1945·No. No. 10857·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We see no reason why the character of the judgment as based on the fraud of appellant as determined by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, should be relitigated in this bankruptcy proceeding.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parkening v. Arnold, 148 F.2d 210, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3219 (9th Cir. 1945).

148 F.2d 210 (Parkening v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.