Parkening v. Arnold

148 F.2d 210, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3219
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 1945
DocketNo. 10857
StatusPublished

This text of 148 F.2d 210 (Parkening v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parkening v. Arnold, 148 F.2d 210, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3219 (9th Cir. 1945).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We see no reason why the character of the judgment as based on the fraud of appellant as determined by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, should be relitigated in this bankruptcy proceeding.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 F.2d 210, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkening-v-arnold-ca9-1945.