Parke v. Heath & M'Cotter

15 Wend. 301
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1836
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 15 Wend. 301 (Parke v. Heath & M'Cotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parke v. Heath & M'Cotter, 15 Wend. 301 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1836).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

If the capias had been returnable out of term, it would have been void, and could not be amended. Miller v. Gregory, 4 Cowen, 504. 2 R. S. 424, § 3. The same rule was laid down in relation to process tested out of term, in Chandler v. Bicknell, 4 Cowen, 49. But the statute already referred to has provided for this case, and mesne process tested out of term may now be amended. “ The court in which any action shall be pending, shall have power to amend any process, pleading or proceeding in such action, either in form or substance, for the furtherance of justice, on such terms as shall be just,” <§>1; but “ process by which any action shall have been commenced, and on which any defendant shall have been arrested, shall not be amended in the return day thereof.” § 3. Chandler v. Bicknell was decided long before the statute was passed, and is no longer applicable. Mesne process tested out of term is not now void, as it was before, but voidable only; and the court will upon proper terms allow it to be amended, whenever that course is requred “ for the furtherance of justice.”

[302]*302As the process was voidable only, and not a nullity, the remedy of the defendants was by motion to set it aside, and the plea is bad. It sets up a mere question of practice, which cannot in general be pleaded. Nichols v. Nichols, 9 Wendell, 263. Independent of this rule, if the process was not absolutely void, the arrest was legal, and the bail-bond valid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leetch v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
4 Daly 518 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1873)
Kelly v. . McCormick
28 N.Y. 318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1863)
Dresser v. Van Pelt
15 How. Pr. 19 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1857)
Leigh v. Alpaugh
24 N.J.L. 629 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1854)
Kelly v. McCormick
2 E.D. Smith 503 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1854)
Covey v. Noggle
13 Barb. 330 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Moot v. Parkhurst
2 Hill & Den. 372 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Wend. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parke-v-heath-mcotter-nysupct-1836.