Parke, Gregory v.Michael Bergeron d/b/a MB Construction

2024 TN WC 55
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedAugust 1, 2024
Docket2023-02-5069
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 TN WC 55 (Parke, Gregory v.Michael Bergeron d/b/a MB Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parke, Gregory v.Michael Bergeron d/b/a MB Construction, 2024 TN WC 55 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

FILED Aug 01, 2024 12:28 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY

GREGORY PARKE, ) Docket Number: 2023-02-5069 Claimant, ) v. ) State File Number: 860311-2023 MICHAEL BERGERON d/b/a ) MB CONSTRUCTION, ) Judge Brian K. Addington Respondent. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

Gregory Parke requested medical and temporary disability benefits for an injury he sustained while working for Michael Bergeron, owner of MB Construction. Mr. Bergeron denied the claim on the basis that Mr. Parke was an independent contractor and not an employee. After a July 25, 2024 expedited hearing, the Court holds Mr. Parke is entitled to the requested benefits. History of Claim Mr. Parke, a Tennessee resident, was installing flooring for Mr. Bergeron on July 5, 2023, when he accidently cut his left hand with a razor knife. He notified Mr. Bergeron, but the company did not have workers’ compensation insurance. Because Mr. Bergeron did not provide any workers’ compensation benefits, Mr. Parke received unauthorized conservative care and continued working until July 21, when pain and swelling caused him to seek emergency treatment. Mr. Parke was diagnosed with septic arthritis and underwent surgery. His treating surgeon, Dr. Jason Fogelman, gave him a non-weightbearing restriction for his left hand and ordered physical therapy. However, Mr. Parke was unable to afford the therapy.1 On September 4, 2023, Dr. Fogleman released Mr. Parke with ten-pound lifting restrictions for his left hand. Later that month, Mr. Parke returned with pain and swelling,

1 Mr. Parke filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on July 27, 2023, notifying the State of his injury and disclosing that Mr. Bergeron did not have workers’ compensation insurance.

1 and Dr. Fogleman recommended an index finger amputation. The surgery was not scheduled because of Mr. Parke’s inability to pay. Mr. Parke demonstrated to the Court that he can barely move his left index finger. He has lost most of his grip strength in that hand and endures constant pain. As to his employment, Mr. Parke stated that Mr. Bergeron was his employer. Mr. Bergeron told him when and where to show up for work, controlled his weekly hours, and paid him $800.00 per week. Mr. Parke requested temporary total disability benefits starting July 21, 2023. He was unable to find work with his restrictions until September 25. He also requested payment of past medical treatment in the amount of $9,675.16 and future medical treatment, including surgery, for his work injury.2 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law To obtain the requested relief, Mr. Parke must show a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2023). First, Mr. Parke must present sufficient evidence that he was Mr. Bergeron’s employee. Section 50-6-102(10)(A) defines an “employee” to include “every person . . . in the service of an employer . . . under any contract of hire . . . written or implied[.]” The following factors are used to determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor: (a) The right to control the conduct of the work; (b) The right of termination; (c) The method of payment; (d) The freedom to select and hire helpers; (e) The furnishing of tools and equipment; (f) Self-scheduling of working hours; and (g) The freedom to offer services to other entities.

Id. at -102(10)(D)(i).

The proof showed that Mr. Parke reported to work at the location assigned by Mr. Bergeron. He performed the type of work Mr. Bergeron told him to do, was paid weekly, and Mr. Bergeron controlled his pay and work schedule. The Court finds that Mr. Parke is likely to prove he was an employee at a final hearing. Mr. Parke testified, and the medical records show, that he suffered a serious injury to his finger while working for Mr. Bergeron. He proved he is likely to succeed at a hearing

2 Mr. Bergeron did not appear for the hearing.

2 on the merits that his injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment under section 50-6-102(12). As for the past medical treatment, “an employer who does not timely provide a panel of physicians risks being required to pay for treatment an injured worker receives on his own.” Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 62, at *10 (Oct. 17, 2017). Because Mr. Bergeron did not provide a panel, Mr. Parke sought treatment on his own. He offered bills from the medical treatment of his injury in the amount of $9,675.16, which Mr. Bergeron must pay. Mr. Parke’s attorney is entitled to fees of 20% of this award. The Court holds that these expenses were reasonable and necessary to treat his injury.

As for future medical treatment, section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) requires Mr. Bergeron to “furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment, medicine, medical and surgical supplies . . . reasonably necessary by accident[.]” Mr. Bergeron must authorize and pay for future medical treatment with Dr. Fogleman, whom the Court designates as Mr. Parke’s authorized treating physician. Mr. Parke also requested temporary partial disability benefits. To obtain these benefits, he must show that Dr. Fogleman returned him to work with restrictions that Mr. Bergeron either could not or would not accommodate. See Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *8 (Dec. 11, 2015). Mr. Parke presented evidence that Dr. Fogleman significantly restricted the use of his injured hand from July 21 through September 24, 2023. Thus, the Court holds that Mr. Parke is entitled to temporary partial disability benefits for that period. To calculate temporary disability benefits, the Court relies on the wage statement Mr. Bergeron filed showing Mr. Parke’s average weekly wage was $711.76 with a resulting compensation rate of $474.50, which included two vacation weeks. Mr. Parke argued his vacation weeks should not be included in his average weekly wage calculation. However, voluntary absences from work are not deducted from the 52-week period used to calculate an average weekly wage. Goodman v. HBD Indus., 208 S.W.3d 373, 377 (Tenn. 2006). Therefore, Mr. Parke is entitled to temporary partial disability benefits at the weekly compensation rate of $474.50 from July 21 through September 24, 2023, in the amount of $4,406.08. Mr. Parke’s attorney is entitled to a 20% fee from this award. Finally, Mr. Bergeron did not have workers’ compensation insurance at the time of Mr. Parke’s injury. The Uninsured Employers Fund has discretion to pay limited temporary disability benefits and medical benefits if certain criteria are met. (See attached Benefits Request Form). Mr. Parke must establish that he: 1) worked for an uninsured employer; 2) suffered an injury arising primarily in the course and scope of employment on or after July 1, 2015; 3) was a Tennessee resident on the date of injury; 4) provided notice to the Bureau of the injury and Mr. Bergeron’s lack of coverage within 180 days of the injury; and, 5)

3 secured a judgment for workers’ compensation benefits against Mr. Bergeron. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-801(d)(1)-(5). The Court finds Mr. Parke worked for an uninsured employer, Mr. Bergeron, and that he is likely to prove at a hearing on the merits that he suffered an injury arising primarily in the course and scope of employment on July 5, 2023. He was a Tennessee resident on that date, and he notified the Bureau within 180 days of the injury and Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodman v. HBD Industries, Inc.
208 S.W.3d 373 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 TN WC 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parke-gregory-vmichael-bergeron-dba-mb-construction-tennworkcompcl-2024.