Parkchester Management Corp. v. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Parkchester Management Corp. v. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York, Inc.

44 N.Y. 778

DecidedApril 27, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y. 778 (Parkchester Management Corp. v. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parkchester Management Corp. v. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York, Inc., 44 N.Y. 778 (N.Y. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, New York County reinstated, [780]*780for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Samuel J. Silverman at the Appellate Division (56 AD2d, at pp 403-405). We would note, however, that this result is founded upon the quasi-voluntary nature of the Rent Stabilization Association, and we express no opinion as to whether the statute authorizes a public agency to impose the type of regulation here in issue.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, New York County reinstated, [780]*780for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Samuel J. Silverman at the Appellate Division (56 AD2d, at pp 403-405). We would note, however, that this result is founded upon the quasi-voluntary nature of the Rent Stabilization Association, and we express no opinion as to whether the statute authorizes a public agency to impose the type of regulation here in issue.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, New York County, reinstated in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 N.Y. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkchester-management-corp-v-rent-stabilization-assn-of-new-york-inc-ny-1978.