Parkchester Apts. Co. v. Lefkowitz
This text of 325 N.E.2d 870 (Parkchester Apts. Co. v. Lefkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. We conclude that the Attorney-General was not justified in refusing to review petitioner’s resulbmission, “ even for the .purpose of determining whether specific deficiencies have been rectified, or new ones found to exist ’ ’, solely on the ground that litigation was pending with respect to a related property. (Cf. Matter of Whalen v. Lefkowitz, 36 N Y 2d 75.)
Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We do not reach the issue tendered on oral argument as to the application in this case of chapter 1021 of the Laws of 1974.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 N.E.2d 870, 36 N.Y.2d 688, 366 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkchester-apts-co-v-lefkowitz-ny-1975.