Parkash v. New York City Water Board
57 A.D.3d 290, 868 N.Y.2d 527
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2008·Published
Opinion
[291]*291Respondent’s determination was neither arbitrary, capricious, nor a violation of law (see Haav 575 Realty Corp. v New York City Water Bd., 38 AD3d 481 [2007]). To the extent that the decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Pistilli Assoc. III, LLC v New York City Water Bd. (46 AD3d 905 [2007]) calls for a different result, we disagree. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parkash v. New York City Water Board, 57 A.D.3d 290, 868 N.Y.2d 527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 290 (Parkash v. New York City Water Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haav 575 Realty Corp. v. New York City Water Board
38 A.D.3d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Pistilli Associates III, LLC v. New York City Water Board
46 A.D.3d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)