Park v. United States

S.D. New York

Park v. United States

61 F. 398, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800

DecidedMay 3, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. 398 (Park v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Park v. United States, 61 F. 398, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800 (S.D.N.Y. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These truffles are not mushrooms, in similitude to which it is claimed they should be assessed, but are found to fall, commonly and commercially, within “vegetables of all hinds prepared or preserved, including pickles and sauces of all kinds not specially provided for.” They, in some way, vegetate, and are a kind of vegetable. Judgment of the hoard of appraisers reversed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

These truffles are not mushrooms, in similitude to which it is claimed they should be assessed, but are found to fall, commonly and commercially, within “vegetables of all hinds prepared or preserved, including pickles and sauces of all kinds not specially provided for.” They, in some way, vegetate, and are a kind of vegetable. Judgment of the hoard of appraisers reversed

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F. 398, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-united-states-nysd-1894.