Park v. United States

S.D. New York

Park v. United States

61 F. 398, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 3, 1894·Published

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These truffles are not mushrooms, in similitude to which it is claimed they should be assessed, but are found to fall, commonly and commercially, within “vegetables of all hinds prepared or preserved, including pickles and sauces of all kinds not specially provided for.” They, in some way, vegetate, and are a kind of vegetable. Judgment of the hoard of appraisers reversed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

These truffles are not mushrooms, in similitude to which it is claimed they should be assessed, but are found to fall, commonly and commercially, within “vegetables of all hinds prepared or preserved, including pickles and sauces of all kinds not specially provided for.” They, in some way, vegetate, and are a kind of vegetable. Judgment of the hoard of appraisers reversed

Park v. United States, 61 F. 398, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2800 (S.D.N.Y. 1894).

Pincite

61 F. 398 (Park v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.