Park v. State

51 S.E. 317, 123 Ga. 164, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1905·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The evidence was altogether circumstantial, and, not being of such a character as to show the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt, a new trial should have been granted.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., and Candler, J., absent. James B. & Noel P. Park, for plaintiff in error, cited Ga. R. 110/293; 97/212 (3); 50/513; 53/252; 57/482; 110/310; 113/721; 114/10; 121/334. John O. Hart, attorney-general, and Joseph H. Pottle, solicitor - general, cited Ga. R. 59/738; 63/90; 92/14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Park v. State, 51 S.E. 317, 123 Ga. 164, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1905).

51 S.E. 317 (Park v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodgers v. State
102 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
June v. State
99 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Brady v. State
126 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)