Park v. State

51 S.E. 317, 123 Ga. 164, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 403
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 51 S.E. 317 (Park v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Park v. State, 51 S.E. 317, 123 Ga. 164, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The evidence was altogether circumstantial, and, not being of such a character as to show the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt, a new trial should have been granted.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., and Candler, J., absent. James B. & Noel P. Park, for plaintiff in error, cited Ga. R. 110/293; 97/212 (3); 50/513; 53/252; 57/482; 110/310; 113/721; 114/10; 121/334. John O. Hart, attorney-general, and Joseph H. Pottle, solicitor - general, cited Ga. R. 59/738; 63/90; 92/14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodgers v. State
102 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
June v. State
99 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Brady v. State
126 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 S.E. 317, 123 Ga. 164, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-state-ga-1905.