Park v. Price
This text of 1 Ky. Op. 17 (Park v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
It is a well-settled principle that parol evidence is not admissible to vary the terms or import of a writing, unless it is alleged in the pleadings that there was fraud or mistake in the execution thereof. This principle is so well established that citation of authorities cannot be necessary.
As appellant’s answer did not contain the necessary allegations to admit the parol evidence, it was properly rejected.
Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. Op. 17, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-price-kyctapp-1866.