Park v. Park

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Park v. Park

20 Va. Cir. 268, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 187

CourtFairfax County Circuit Court

DecidedJuly 9, 1990

DocketCase No. (Chancery) 111266

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Va. Cir. 268 (Park v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fairfax County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Park v. Park, 20 Va. Cir. 268, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 187 (Va. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE THOMAS A. FORTKORT

The court does retain the power to modify the pendente lite decree. The parties may have entered into a contract by agreeing to a consent order, nevertheless modification of this type of agreement is not prohibited by § 20-109. Section 20-109 is limited to final dispositions of alimony and support and not to support pendente lite. The companion Section 20-109.1 also speaks to a final decree.

The decree pendente lite may be modified by the court upon a showing of a change of circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE THOMAS A. FORTKORT

The court does retain the power to modify the pendente lite decree. The parties may have entered into a contract by agreeing to a consent order, nevertheless modification of this type of agreement is not prohibited by § 20-109. Section 20-109 is limited to final dispositions of alimony and support and not to support pendente lite. The companion Section 20-109.1 also speaks to a final decree.

The decree pendente lite may be modified by the court upon a showing of a change of circumstances.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Va. Cir. 268, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-park-vaccfairfax-1990.