Park v. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Park v. Park

110 A.D. 866, 95 N.Y.S. 1150

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.D. 866 (Park v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Park v. Park, 110 A.D. 866, 95 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental an'swer. The fact that She did not make, the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ. Order reversed and motion

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental an'swer. The fact that She did not make, the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ. Order reversed and motion

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D. 866, 95 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-park-nyappdiv-1905.