Park v. Park

65 Ga. 746
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 65 Ga. 746 (Park v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Park v. Park, 65 Ga. 746 (Ga. 1880).

Opinion

JACKSON, Chief Justice.

This bill was brought by the complainant against the defendant as executor of the will of her aunt, for account touching certain chattels, and especially for two thousand dollars, all of which was bequeathed as a legacy to complainant in an item of decedent’s will. The defendant demurred on the ground that there was no equity in the bill, and that the remedy at law was adequate and complete. The court overruled this demurrer and error is assigned here thereon.

The relation between the parties is that of trustee and cestui que trust, and in such cases equity has jurisdiction. Code, §§3130, 3193 ! 61 Ga., 125.

Besides, fraudulent conduct is charged in the bill. Even if a court of common law had concurrent jurisdiction, that would not oust equity on matters within its [748]*748peculiar province. Code, §3096. Our courts of equity have generally the same jurisdiction as English chancery courts. Code, §3100. And-in England the jurisdiction is clear. Williams on Ex’rs, 1645 ; 5 Term., 690.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin v. Raiford
61 Ga. 125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Ga. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-park-ga-1880.