Park v. Matthews
36 Pa. 28
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Testatrix bequeathed $5000 to her brother, to be received and held by trustees, and the interest or proceeds to be annually paid over to the legatee for his use and benefit. The legatee’s creditor attached the interest.
We hold that it was attachable, because it was his, in law and equity. If the trustees had withheld it from him, he could have sued for and recovered it. Wherever a party has a right of action, his creditors may attach the debt, unless it be for wages.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Park v. Matthews, 36 Pa. 28 (Pa. 1859).
36 Pa. 28 (Park v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Saunders
463 A.2d 1146 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Roehm v. Stetson
50 Pa. D. & C. 98 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Winthrop Co. v. Clinton
46 A. 435 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)