Park v. Mackobee

6 Ky. Op. 186, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 495
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 30, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ky. Op. 186 (Park v. Mackobee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Park v. Mackobee, 6 Ky. Op. 186, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 495 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Opinion

[187]*187OPINION by

Judge Lindsay':

The evidence of the witness Pelfrey to the effect that he offered to exchange the mare which appellant received from appellee for the desired horse Was irrelevant and ought to have been excluded from the consideration of the jury. Appellant’s right of action against ap-pellee, if he had one, had become perfect long before this offer was made and he was under no obligation to accept satisfaction from Pelfrey of any demand or right of action plaintiff may have had against appellee. The second instruction given for appellee, 'based as it is upon Pelfrey’s testimony, is erroneous and misleading. For these reasons the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial upon principles not inconsistent with this opinion.

-, for appellant.

-, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ky. Op. 186, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-mackobee-kyctapp-1872.