Park v. Mackobee
This text of 6 Ky. Op. 186 (Park v. Mackobee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[187]*187OPINION by
The evidence of the witness Pelfrey to the effect that he offered to exchange the mare which appellant received from appellee for the desired horse Was irrelevant and ought to have been excluded from the consideration of the jury. Appellant’s right of action against ap-pellee, if he had one, had become perfect long before this offer was made and he was under no obligation to accept satisfaction from Pelfrey of any demand or right of action plaintiff may have had against appellee. The second instruction given for appellee, 'based as it is upon Pelfrey’s testimony, is erroneous and misleading. For these reasons the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial upon principles not inconsistent with this opinion.
-, for appellant.
-, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. Op. 186, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-v-mackobee-kyctapp-1872.