Park Avenue Investment & Development, Inc. v. Franz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Park Avenue Investment & Development, Inc. v. Franz

455 So. 2d 1163, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2081, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15190

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1984

DocketNo. 84-265

StatusPublished

This text of 455 So. 2d 1163 (Park Avenue Investment & Development, Inc. v. Franz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Park Avenue Investment & Development, Inc. v. Franz, 455 So. 2d 1163, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2081, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered against the appellant in its action for damages from appellees, for allegedly falsely representing that an apartment building sold to appellant was properly zoned for 12 units when, in fact, the maximum number of units permissible was 10. We reverse because of the existence of material issues of fact as to the representations made, the reasonableness of the reliance thereon by appellant, and the agency of the person making some of the respresentations. See Held v. Trafford Realty Co., 414 So.2d 631 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) and Besett v. Basnett, 389 So.2d 995 (Fla.1980).

ANSTEAD, C.J., DELL, J., and GEIGER, DWIGHT L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered against the appellant in its action for damages from appellees, for allegedly falsely representing that an apartment building sold to appellant was properly zoned for 12 units when, in fact, the maximum number of units permissible was 10. We reverse because of the existence of material issues of fact as to the representations made, the reasonableness of the reliance thereon by appellant, and the agency of the person making some of the respresentations. See Held v. Trafford Realty Co., 414 So.2d 631 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) and Besett v. Basnett, 389 So.2d 995 (Fla.1980).

ANSTEAD, C.J., DELL, J., and GEIGER, DWIGHT L., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

455 So. 2d 1163, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2081, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/park-avenue-investment-development-inc-v-franz-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack