Parisien v. 21st Century Ins. Co.
Opinion
against
21st Century Insurance Company, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Bryan M. Rothenberg (Sharon A. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (John J. Kelley, J.), entered May 6, 2016. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of a lack of medical necessity.
Contrary to plaintiff's argument on appeal, defendant established that the denial of claim forms, which had denied the claims on the ground of a lack of medical necessity, had been timely mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 16, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parisien v. 21st Century Ins. Co. (Parisien v. 21st Century Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.