Parisi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parisi v. City of New York

281 A.D. 852, 119 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 852 (Parisi v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parisi v. City of New York, 281 A.D. 852, 119 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of the negligence of an operator in placing the exit door of his bus adjacent to a pile of ice on which she slipped and fell while alighting from the bus. Her husband sued to recover for loss of services and for expenses. Judgment for plaintiffs reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry thereof, plaintiff wife stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor from $40,000 to $30,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The verdict in favor of the plaintiff wife is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of the negligence of an operator in placing the exit door of his bus adjacent to a pile of ice on which she slipped and fell while alighting from the bus. Her husband sued to recover for loss of services and for expenses. Judgment for plaintiffs reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry thereof, plaintiff wife stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor from $40,000 to $30,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The verdict in favor of the plaintiff wife is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 852, 119 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parisi-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1953.