Parish v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Parish v. State

1930 OK CR 244, 288 P. 1117, 47 Okla. Crim. 403, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 403

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 24, 1930

DocketNo. A-7212.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 244 (Parish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parish v. State, 1930 OK CR 244, 288 P. 1117, 47 Okla. Crim. 403, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 403 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of *404 Tillman county of assault and battery, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Defendant was charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, and was convicted of the included offense of assault and battery.

No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. An examination of the record discloses that at the time charged, defendant, who assisted in an automobile repair shop, had a dispute with one Lee Higgs in reference to some work, during the course of which he struck Higgs in the head with an iron pulley, inflicting a serious wound and a slight fracture of the skull. The jury was extremely lenient under the circumstances shown by the record. The testimony would sustain a conviction for the higher offense. There is no material error apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of *404 Tillman county of assault and battery, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Defendant was charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, and was convicted of the included offense of assault and battery.

No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. An examination of the record discloses that at the time charged, defendant, who assisted in an automobile repair shop, had a dispute with one Lee Higgs in reference to some work, during the course of which he struck Higgs in the head with an iron pulley, inflicting a serious wound and a slight fracture of the skull. The jury was extremely lenient under the circumstances shown by the record. The testimony would sustain a conviction for the higher offense. There is no material error apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 244, 288 P. 1117, 47 Okla. Crim. 403, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parish-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.