Parisette v. Parisette

35 N.Y.S. 1114

This text of 35 N.Y.S. 1114 (Parisette v. Parisette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parisette v. Parisette, 35 N.Y.S. 1114 (superctny 1895).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the motion herein by the judge at special term was based upon conclusions of fact fully supported by the affidavits. The motion was properly denied. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with 810 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parisette-v-parisette-superctny-1895.