Parisette v. Parisette
14 Misc. 645
This text of 14 Misc. 645 (Parisette v. Parisette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Parisette v. Parisette, 14 Misc. 645 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The denial of the motion herein, by 'the judge at Special Term was based upon conclusions of fact fully supported by the affidavits.
The motion was properly denied. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, J J.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 Misc. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parisette-v-parisette-nysuperctnyc-1895.