Parise v. Pepe
This text of 270 A.D. 769 (Parise v. Pepe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a partnership accounting, the complaint alleged that plaintiffs and respondent were partners in the conduct of a package liquor store business, and that the license therefor was issued in the name of respondent. The complaint was dismissed on respondent’s motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Carmine v. Murphy, 285 N. Y. 413; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 263 App. Div. 820, affd. 288 N. Y. 579.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 769, 59 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parise-v-pepe-nyappdiv-1946.