Parise v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parise v. Pepe

270 A.D. 769, 59 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3879

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1946·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action for a partnership accounting, the complaint alleged that plaintiffs and respondent were partners in the conduct of a package liquor store business, and that the license therefor was issued in the name of respondent. The complaint was dismissed on respondent’s motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Carmine v. Murphy, 285 N. Y. 413; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 263 App. Div. 820, affd. 288 N. Y. 579.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a partnership accounting, the complaint alleged that plaintiffs and respondent were partners in the conduct of a package liquor store business, and that the license therefor was issued in the name of respondent. The complaint was dismissed on respondent’s motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Carmine v. Murphy, 285 N. Y. 413; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 263 App. Div. 820, affd. 288 N. Y. 579.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ.

Parise v. Pepe, 270 A.D. 769, 59 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

270 A.D. 769 (Parise v. Pepe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related