Paris v. State
135 S.W. 547, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 614
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 Tex. Crim. 503 →
Opinion
This conviction was for aggravated assault. The record is before us' without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The only question suggested for revision is found in the motion for a new trial, to wit: The judgment is contrary to the law and not supported by the evidence. As the statement of facts is not before us, we are unable to determine those questions. The conviction is in harmony with the allegations contained in the pleadings.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paris v. State, 135 S.W. 547, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 614 (Tex. 1911).
135 S.W. 547 (Paris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.