PARIS INTERN. RECORDS & FILMWORKS, INC. v. Rodriguez

539 So. 2d 5, 1989 WL 13071
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1989
Docket88-738
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 539 So. 2d 5 (PARIS INTERN. RECORDS & FILMWORKS, INC. v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PARIS INTERN. RECORDS & FILMWORKS, INC. v. Rodriguez, 539 So. 2d 5, 1989 WL 13071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

539 So.2d 5 (1989)

PARIS INTERNATIONAL RECORDS & FILMWORKS, INC. and Jose Ramon Martinez, Appellants,
v.
Magaly RODRIGUEZ a/K/a Maga, Appellee.

No. 88-738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 21, 1989.

Harvey S. Swickle, Richard C. Wolfe, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

David M. Shenkman, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendants [Paris International Records & Filmworks, Inc. and Jose Ramon Martinez] from a non-final order striking the defendant's pleadings, granting injunctive relief as requested by the plaintiff [Magaly Rodriguez a/k/a Maga] and setting the cause for a trial on damages. The basis for the subject order was that counsel for the defendants failed to attend a case management conference as ordered by the trial court. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.200(c). We have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(B), (C)(iv), and reverse upon a holding that the striking of pleadings and granting the affirmative relief requested by plaintiff based on the failure of defense counsel to appear at a case management conference, without more, is too severe a sanction to impose upon a litigant where, as here, the record is devoid of any evidence reflecting counsel's wilful or flagrant disregard of the court's authority. Aller v. Editorial Planeta, S.A., 389 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Crystal Lake Golf Course, Inc. v. Kalin, 252 So.2d 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

The non-final order under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Special K Investors, Inc. v. Meiman
197 So. 3d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Millan v. Williams
655 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Carazo v. Status Shipping, Ltd.
613 So. 2d 1329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Nautical Management Ass'n v. Culmer
573 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Supply Co.
548 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 5, 1989 WL 13071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paris-intern-records-filmworks-inc-v-rodriguez-fladistctapp-1989.