Parillo v. Nataro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parillo v. Nataro

18 A.D.2d 709, 236 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6276

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 709 (Parillo v. Nataro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parillo v. Nataro, 18 A.D.2d 709, 236 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff while he was a passenger in defendant’s automobile, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 8, 1962, which granted defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer so as to allege two new defenses. The original answer had pleaded denials only. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. We do not pass upon the sufficiency of the proposed defenses which are fully described in the opinion rendered at Special Term (34 Mise 2d 800). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff while he was a passenger in defendant’s automobile, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 8, 1962, which granted defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer so as to allege two new defenses. The original answer had pleaded denials only. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. We do not pass upon the sufficiency of the proposed defenses which are fully described in the opinion rendered at Special Term (34 Mise 2d 800). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 709, 236 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parillo-v-nataro-nyappdiv-1962.